Persuasive/Argumentative Paper for Social Security

Paper for Interpreter of Maladies

Research Paper associated with Outliers

Final For English ENGWR 300


Grades

Homework

Total Grade


English Composition

Tim Kahl (916) 714-5401 (Please no calls after 9:30 PM) also appears as Victor Schnickelfritz

e-mail: tnklbnny@mongryl.com

M., Tu., Wed., Thur. 8:00-10:05 [2nd 6 Weeks]

Rodda South 311, Course Code: 13424

Required Texts:

Because being successful in today's job market requires men and women to have at least some working knowledge of computers, if at all possible, papers should be done using a word processor. Familiarizing yourself early with the word processor will save you much grief later on in your college career.

Course Objectives:

Attendance Policy: There are 24 days we are scheduled to meet. Please be present for all of them. Any absence will greatly affect your ability to meet the requirements of the course. Absences and/or early departures in excess of 3 class periods may result in my dropping you from the course. Attendance will be noted and taken into consideration concerning borderline grades when the final grade is given.

Remember: You're paying for the time whether you come or not.

Electronic Submissions: You may choose to submit any and or all of your work via electronic submissions. You may submit:

Electronic submissions of papers and study questions are allowed (and actually encouraged). Submissions may be sent as Microsoft Word attachments or may be cut-and-pasted into the field of your e-mail application. My comments will come back with colored text on them, so you will need to have an e-mail program that will support colored text, such as Outlook, Outlook Express or Entourage (for Mac) and that is either rtf-based or html-based (preferable). If you are sending your e-mail from a website, such as hotmail, etc., then you will be able to receive colored text at that site.

All submissions should include your real name (along with your online handle if you like) and the type of assignment in the "To" or "Subject" box.

It is highly advisable to make a test e-mail for an important document if you are using electronic submissions for the first time and you are unsure of your ability to send the document.

Due Dates For Electronic Submissions: Must be dated and timed before class period in order to be exempt from the aforementioned 10% late penalty. [Some extensions may be given due to extenuating technical circumstances].

Revision Policy: One of the three out-of class papers may be turned in for revision. This paper must be below a 90 % to be eligible for revision. Due Dates: All assignments are due on the dates given (unless otherwise notified). Late assignments will be assessed a 10% penalty per late class session.

Plagiarism: Plagiarism is pretending that someone else's ideas or writing is your own. Intentional failure to cite source material will be dealt with quickly and severely.

Behavior Expected In Class:

Campus Crisis Counselor Bob Garcia (916) 558-2118

Grading Scale:

  87% to 89% B+ 77% to 79% C+ 67% to 69% D+ Below 60% F
92% to100% A 83% to 86% B 74% to 76% C 63% to 66% D  
90% to 91% A- 80% to 83% B- 70% to 73% C- 60% to 62% D-  

 

 

 

Criterion For Grades On Written Assignments:

A work requires a compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is clear and balanced. There are no tangled sentences. A varied length of sentences is present and correct sentence structure is used. The pattern of development is clear and apparent and demonstrates forethought regarding the desired effect upon the reader. The styleand tone are appropriate to the topic and audience. There may be an occasional mistake in mechanics. The topic of the paper should aim to be fresh and original and should attempt to stretch the academic horizons of the writer.
B work requires a compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is generally clear and balanced, but there may be some instances in which there are some confusing or awkward sentences, though these do not detract from the overall effect of the paper. A somewhat limited variety of sentences may exist, but the sentence structure is generally correct. The pattern of development is apparent, but may deviate at times. The style and tone of the paper are generally appropriate to the topic and audience. There are relatively few mistakes in mechanics. The topic may not demonstrate any original thinking or particularly or novel approach to the assignment.
C work requires a fair amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment, but may miss the stated objectives to some degree. Content is generally clear and balanced, but there may be several points where the sentence structure becomes jumbled and confused and this interferes with the flow of the paper. A limited variety of sentences is readily apparent. The pattern of development may be vague and unclear, but there is more than a semblance of formal constraint apparent. The style and tone may be somewhat varied and inappropriate for both the topic (misnomers) and the perceived audience. The topic does not demonstrate any novel approach to the given assignment. There are a distracting number of mistakes in mechanics.
D work demonstrates a minimal amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is unclear and unbalanced and there may be a significant amount of jumbled and confused sentences. The pattern of development is unapparent and it demonstrates a lack of forethought on the part of the writer. The style and tone of the paper are wildly varied and inappropriate for both the topic and the perceived audience. The topic does not demonstrate any novel approach to the given assignment. There are an overwhelming number of mistakes in mechanics. In general, the paper demonstrates a hurried and haphazard approach devoid of any forethought (i.e. the paper that is written the night before).
F work demonstrates a minimal amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Any work deemed to be completely unsatisfactory with regard to content, pattern of development, style, tone, topic, or mechanics. A paper in this category demonstrates an absolute minimum of effort.

Scoring

Persuasive/Argumentative Paper [Social Security] 100
Comparison Contrast Paper [Interpreter of Maladies] 100
Thesis/Outline [Research Paper] 10
Thesis and Outline 20
Subject A-like "in-class" Essay #1 50
Homework assignments/Quizzes 140
Research paper 200
   
   

 

Total 620

 


Schedule Of Events

RS 208 M,Tu.,W,Th. 8:00-10:05 [1st 6 weeks]

Note: This schedule reflects work that will be discussed in class on the date given. Students should be prepared to discuss the items listed for that day.

Week 1

M June 21 Introductions/ Syllabus/ Grammar Review
Tu June 22 Grammar Review
W June 23

Social Security assignment #1 due; discussion of guidelines for Social Security paper.

Th June 24

Social Security assignment #2 due; discussion of guidelines for Social Security paper.

Grammar Review

 

Week 2

M June 28

Social Security assignment #3 due; discussion of guidelines for Social Security paper.

Tu June 29

rough drafts of Social Security paper due

W June 30

Peer Review and discussion of Social Security rough drafts continued.

Th July 1

Final draft of Social Security paper due; Grammar Review Day

Interpreter of Maladies study questions #1 due; discussion of paper guidelines for The Interpreter of Maladies.

 

Week 3

M July 5 Holiday—Independence Day
Tu July 6

Interpreter of Maladies study questions #2 due

discussion of MLA parenthetical citation

W July 7

Interpreter of Maladies study questions #3 due

Begin discussion and peer review of rough drafts of paper for Interpreter of Maladies due

Th July 8

Peer Review and discussion of rough drafts for Interpreter of Maladies continued. Grammar Review Day

 

Week 4

M July 12

Final draft of Interpreter of Maladies paper due; Grammar Review Day

Discussion of guidelines for Research Paper; Outliers study questions #1 due

Tu July 13 Outliers study questions #2 due; researching techniques
W July 14 Outliers study questions #3 due ;
Th July 15

Outliers discussion of topics for research paper

discussion of MLA parenthetical citation (yes, again)

 

Week 5

M July 19

* Outliers study questions #4 due discussion of rough drafts; Grammar Review Day; outline and thesis due

Tu July 20

* discussion of outlines and theses; Grammar Review Day; Review of previous student rough draft

W July 21 Review of previous student rough draft
Th July 22 Rough drafts of research papers due

 

Week 6

M July 26 Grammar review day; rough drafts of research paper due
Tu July 27 Rough drafts of research papers continued
W July 28 Final draft of the research paper due/Discussion of Final
Th July 29 Final